AmyStrange.org and the UNeXpLaiNed ©Copyrighted by Dave Ayotte & Caty Bergman

THIS PAGE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION

The Creation of the Universe
(Research and Field Notes... and excuses)




FIRST, SOME OF OUR BEST EXCUSES:  [FUCK THIS! TAKE ME TO THE GOOD STUFF NOW!!]

WE ARE TRYING OUR BEST to atleast get a minimal working webpage about this subject up as soon as possible.

More than half of our website webpages are up and running, and all (if not most) of the links should be working and please feel free to CONTACT US if you run across any problems in that area, or for any reason at all. That would help us so much too, because there is so much more of that kind of thing that needs to be done here, not to mention all the research that still needs to be started and all that writing and typing and proofreading...

OH MY GAWD! This is truly a never ending job and you either love it, or you go home.




NOW, THE GOOD STUFF:

THAT BEING SAID, we did do some preliminary work on when exactly the Universe was created, the date and who figured it out.

Let's forget about the Big-Bang Theory for right now, hopefully we'll get to that soon (but it won't be pretty), and the two names we came up with so far are Johannes Kepler and Bishop Ussher. We have a date from Kepler and also a TDIH webpage dedicated to it, with research notes and a lot more about Kepler:

4977-APR-27 BC (Research Notes)

But the date from Ussher is just a little more complicated than Kepler's. The year (4004 BC) stays the same, but the day in October fluctuates from either the 9th, to the 14th, than to the 22nd, and finally, the 23rd. Although Ussher did have the day of the week down, or so it would seem, because from what we've read, we think that in the end the date that was finally chosen was a Monday, and from what we understood in our research was that Sunday would just not do as the beginning day of creation.

Anyway, long story short, we'll have to get back to this after we get some more books on Ussher and Kepler and hopefully that'll be real soon.




NOW, ABOUT THAT BIG-BANG THEORY:

I SAY, WHAT ABOUT IT? That singularity thing just doesn't explain anything to me. What happened before the singularity is what I want to to know. Was there another Big-Bang before this one, and before that one... without beginning?

Was there "another" creation where people like us that are asking the same questions we are here? Why is this happening and who's responsible, and what are we suppose to do about it? What if it turns out, and don't even ask us to speculate on how we would find this out, but what if all we are is just some God-awful long science experiment hidden away in some guys locker at some Greyhound bus station located either in Heaven or near some lab or school somewhere or maybe in some alternate Universe, in some guys garage, under an old work bench, stuck behind an old dusty pair of shoes, long forgotten by the one who put it there?

Ironically enough, it might have been a birthday present that didn't work after the button was pushed or the software activated, and was then thrown across the room where it ended up under a work bench and then forgotten.

What no one knew was that the throw across the room had fixed what was wrong with it and activated the creation sequence that you could hook up to what they would consider (in that Universe) to be a large life-size holographic experience, that for all intent and purposes, you would feel like you were at that time and place, and you could interact with an intelligent creation if you wanted, but that took years to master, before a majority of all the other owners thought you should be allowed to do it.

There were even urban legends put into place about owners vanishing into the game, never to be seen or heard from again, because they interacted a little too much with the creations in the toy.

At least this is what some people say, and whether it's true or not, it scares enough owners so that only a very, very few ever admit doing it, with an even a smaller number than that admitting to killing or having sex with one, which is why locks were put in place to restrict access to that particular function, but they were ridiculously easy to get around.

Besides all that, after a few days it would be like having a massive library of movies that you can search through and watch, caring little that no creation, no matter how fast it developed, would be able to stop the return to the singularity so that the Big-Bang can happen again and again without end.

The toy would create and destroy, once activated, one Universe a day, or whatever the default settings were, which the owner could change anytime they wanted.

Now let's say that each atom inside each of these toys, the ones used to create each Universe, over and over again, what if each atom was like a pixel that together creates the pictures we see on a computer monitor, what if each atom could be recorded every second of it's existence and where it's located is recorded like a pixel in a digital recording of a movie on some kind of hard-drive bigger (and, at the same time, smaller) than anything anyone could ever imagine.

Now imagine this, that for every one of their seconds, a billion of our seconds squared by a billion and then squared again and again, and then squared like that a billion more times without end, all recorded and slowed down for the convenience the owner of the toy.

What if all we are is someone's electronic ant farm?

That's as far as we'll go with all that, for now anyway. I personally really do like physics a little bit, especially the quantum side of it, but my problem with the Big-Bang theory is that it's all just too neat and tidy. It never really explains any real beginning. It doesn't explain exactly how the singularity was created and by whom or what and for what reason, if any at all.

We'll probably never get the answers to any of that, at least not in anyone's lifetime today anyway, unless we can get access to that hard drive that holds the memory of everything that has ever happened, everywhere.

Yeah, that'll happen.

And now there are rumours coming out of Sweden (where the Large Haldron Collider is located and is back up and running again) rumours that maybe the Big-Bang will be disproved soon, maybe. It has something to do with dark matter, I think. Last time around, they were able to create some dark matter that would stick around for less than a second. Besides being what most scientist believe fills in the space between the planets and stars (and things like that), dark matter is also believed to be what gives atoms their substance. It's what makes them real to us, so to speak, and what also makes us real, at least in the Universe we know.




HERE'S AN INTERESTING THOUGHT:

WHAT IF all the singularity is, is all the dark matter disappearing, like the charge in a battery? Remember that age-old adage that nature abhors a vacuum, well most scientist seem to think that it's true. When you create a vacuum, nature does everything it can to make that vacuum disappear, but whatever it does has to at least follow the known laws of physics, which is why dark matter is needed. Without it, a vacuum would exist and you know how much nature abhors a vacuum. Catastrophic wouldn't even begin to explain what would happen next.

Without dark matter, all the atoms in the Universe would come together and squeeze into one single singularity, which would result in it being charged up again, which would then result in it exploding again, which would create more dark matter which would eventually end up losing it's charge again, and would once again disappear... and well, you know the rest?

We told you, it was just a thought.






[TOP]
©Copyrighted by Dave Ayotte & Caty Bergman
LAST UPDATED: Saturday,  July 11, 2015